Thursday, May 14, 2009

New Leadership Style (Discussion)

"Whoever would be great among you must be your servant." (Mark 10:43)

Two of the disciples came before Jesus and said, "Grant us what we ask." "What do you want?" said Jesus. "Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory." It reflected the culture of that day. These were two prominent members of Jesus' band of disciples, James and John. They wanted the positions of greatest honor when Jesus ushered in His kingdom. Jesus pointed out that it might be like that in the world, where rulers lord it over one another, but in His kingdom, the position of honor was being a servant. He even said, "For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." On the occasion of the Passover, Jesus went so far as to Himself wash the disciple's feet, modeling what He taught.

In a world where we 'have it our way' this model of leadership is rare. We are taught to excel, be the best, outdo everyone else. Even in the church people vie for positions of authority and respect. Where are the servants? Where are the leaders who are willing to be used up in service to their King? What does it really mean to be a servant?

I am not interested in blog discussions that deal with the theoretical. How about a discussion on real life servanthood. Are you one of the few, the unproud, the disciples? Nathan Barlow was a medical doctor who chose to use his skills in Ethiopia for over 60 years. Once during his time of service he developed a severe tooth ache that caused him to have to leave the mission field to be treated. He was so determined not to be away again from the mission field that he had all of his teeth pulled and replaced with false teeth. (Crazy Love, Francis Chan). We live in a comfortable environment in the church in the USA. Where is the servant spirit in leadership and ministry, and I am not talking about just the paid professionals, but the pew sitters as well?

3 comments:

  1. Some of your comments like "not interested in
    theortical discussion", "paid professionals",
    "pew sitters"; seems to close rather open the
    feedback and discussion you are asking for.
    Anon

    ReplyDelete
  2. The intention was to narrow the scope of the topic, not the participants.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe that was the intent but the result appears
    to be some what different. Anon

    ReplyDelete